Finance & economics | Free exchange

This year’s Nobel prizes prompt soul-searching among economists

The rise of randomised controlled trials looks to some like a retreat from the biggest questions

NOBEL PRIZES are usually given in recognition of ideas that are already more or less guaranteed a legacy. But occasionally they prompt as much debate as admiration. This year’s economics award, given to Abhijit Banerjee, Esther Duflo and Michael Kremer, was unusual both for the recency of the contributions it recognised and the relative youth of the recipients. (For a review of “Good Economics for Hard Times”, by Mr Banerjee and Ms Duflo, see Books and arts section.) Intentionally or not, it has inflamed arguments about the direction of the profession.

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Works in progress”

Hong Kong in revolt

From the November 23rd 2019 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Finance & economics

The stockmarket rout may not be over

As investors pause for breath, we assess what could turn a correction into a crash

Why Japanese stocks are on a rollercoaster ride

Volatility in global markets continues


Why Japanese markets have plummeted

The global rout continues, with the Topix experiencing its worst day since 1987


Swing-state economies are doing just fine

They would be doing even better if the Biden-Harris administration had been more cynical

Can Kamala Harris win on the economy?

A visit to a crucial swing state reveals the problems she will face

Why fear is sweeping markets everywhere

American and Japanese indices have taken a battering. So have banks and gold