The case for mutual educational disarmament
And for a high-stakes, lower-effort test

ECONOMISTS TEND to be big fans of education, which is perhaps not surprising given how much of it they consume and how well their textbooks can do. Alfred Marshall, writing in 1873, hoped that education would help erase the “distinction between working men and gentlemen”. Gary Becker of the University of Chicago reimagined education as an investment in “human capital” that would earn a return in the market much like other assets. Harvard University’s Greg Mankiw, whose books have educated more than most, once calculated that differences in human capital between countries could account for much of their otherwise inexplicable differences in prosperity.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Assume the positional”
More from Finance & economics

The stockmarket rout may not be over
As investors pause for breath, we assess what could turn a correction into a crash

Why Japanese stocks are on a rollercoaster ride
Volatility in global markets continues

Why Japanese markets have plummeted
The global rout continues, with the Topix experiencing its worst day since 1987
Swing-state economies are doing just fine
They would be doing even better if the Biden-Harris administration had been more cynical
Can Kamala Harris win on the economy?
A visit to a crucial swing state reveals the problems she will face
Why fear is sweeping markets everywhere
American and Japanese indices have taken a battering. So have banks and gold