Mines are the neglected workhorses of naval strategy
They are cheap to deploy and expensive to get rid of
The sexy end of modern naval forces, observes Duncan Potts, a retired vice-admiral in Britain’s Royal Navy, is stuff like guided-missile destroyers, fast jets and nuclear submarines. But it is often a far humbler device, the naval mine, that does much of the damage. During the second world war, these static underwater bombs are reckoned to have sunk 2,100 vessels. Not as many as the 4,600 accounted for by submarines, but far more than attacks by aircraft or artillery bombardment by other ships. Subsequent conflicts have seen mines cripple or send to the bottom nearly four times as many American warships as all other types of weapons combined.
This article appeared in the Science & technology section of the print edition under the headline “Lurkers below”
From the September 3rd 2022 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the editionMore from Science & technology
How to reduce the risk of developing dementia
A healthy lifestyle can prevent or delay almost half of cases
GPT, Claude, Llama? How to tell which AI model is best
Beware model-makers marking their own homework
How America built an AI tool to predict Taliban attacks
“Raven Sentry” was a successful experiment in open-source intelligence
Gene-editing drugs are moving from lab to clinic at lightning speed
The promising treatments still face technical and economic hurdles, though
How Ukraine’s new tech foils Russian aerial attacks
It is pioneering acoustic detection, with surprising success
The deep sea is home to “dark oxygen”
Nodules on the seabed, rather than photosynthesis, are the source of the gas