Economists still lack a proper understanding of business cycles
The second in our series on the shortcomings of the economics profession
THE aftermath of the 2007-08 financial crisis ought to have been a moment of triumph for economics. Lessons learned from the 1930s prevented the collapse of global finance and trade, and resulted in a downturn far shorter and less severe than the Depression. But even as the policy remedies were helpful, the crisis exposed the economic profession’s continued ignorance of the business cycle. That is bad news not just for the discipline, but for everyone.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Diminished expectations”
Finance & economics April 21st 2018
- After a good run of growth, China’s economy braces for bumps
- A Victorian survivor
- Tax cuts and higher interest rates help boost banks’ earnings
- Coco bonds have not lived up to their promise
- Indicators that signal financial-market trouble are flashing
- America’s Treasury refrains from naming any currency manipulators
- Hong Kong defends its dollar peg in both directions
- Economists still lack a proper understanding of business cycles
From the April 21st 2018 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the editionMore from Finance & economics
The stockmarket rout may not be over
As investors pause for breath, we assess what could turn a correction into a crash
Why Japanese stocks are on a rollercoaster ride
Volatility in global markets continues
Why Japanese markets have plummeted
The global rout continues, with the Topix experiencing its worst day since 1987
Swing-state economies are doing just fine
They would be doing even better if the Biden-Harris administration had been more cynical
Can Kamala Harris win on the economy?
A visit to a crucial swing state reveals the problems she will face
Why fear is sweeping markets everywhere
American and Japanese indices have taken a battering. So have banks and gold